The fallacy of full guaranteeism
Keywords:
punitive limitation, fundamental rights, social justice, criminal liability, procedural guaranteesAbstract
This article critically examines the current known as Integral Criminal Garanteeism, contrasting it with Luigi Ferrajoli's original theory. Classical criminal garanteeism seeks to limit the punitive power of the state through principles such as legality, culpability, necessity, and materiality. Integral garantismo goes further by proposing that the criminal justice system be an active instrument of social justice, including victims and collective rights, and relativizes guarantees in favor of social protection. However, this perspective may contradict the aims of the guarantee theory, as it expands the use of criminal sanctions and restricts individual guarantees. It should be noted that this rhetorical appropriation of the term “guaranteeism” may result in an authoritarian criminal law rather than a system of effective guarantees.
Downloads
References
(1) Ferrajoli, Luigi. Direito e razão: teoria do garantismo penal. 3. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais. 2010. p. 208.
(2) Abi-Ackel Torres, Henrique. Política criminal contemporânea: o discurso populista na intervenção punitiva. Belo Horizonte: D’Plácido, 2018. p. 168 e 169.
(3) Ferrajoli, op. cit., p. 422/425.
(4) Idem, ibidem, p. 785.
(5) Idem, ibidem, p. 91.
(6) Abi-Ackel Torres, op. cit., p. 172.
(7) Ferrajoli, Luigi. Democracia e medo. Trad. Sérgio Lamarão. Discursos Sediciosos: crime direito e sociedade, Rio de Janeiro, ano 19, n. 21-22. p. 117-127, p. 124.
(8) Fischer, Douglas. O que é garantismo (penal) integral? In: Calabrich, Bruno; Fischer, Douglas; Pelela, Eduardo. Garantismo penal integral. Questões penais e processuais, criminalidade moderna e aplicação do modelo garantista no Brasil.
3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2015. p. 30-77, p. 39
(9) Ferrajoli, Luigi. Derechos y garantias: la ley del más débil. Tradução. Perfecto Andrés Ibáñez e Andrea Greppi. 4. ed. Madrid: Editorial Trotta, 2004. p. 29-30.
(10) Fischer. O que é garantismo?..., p. 34.
(11) Ferrajoli, Democracia e medo..., p. 119.
(12) Idem, ibidem, p. 125.
(13) Hassemer, Winfried. Prevención general y aplicación de la pena. In: Naucke, Wolfgang; Hassemer, Winfried; Lüderssen, Klaus. Principales problemas de la prevención general. Buenos Aires: Julio César Faira, 2006. (Maestros del derecho penal, 14). p. 45-82, p. 60- 61
(14) Wilson, James Q. Thinking about crime. New York: Basic Books, 2013. p. 107.
(15) Ferrajoli. Direito e razão..., p. 786.
(16) Fischer. O que é garantismo?..., p. 55-73.
(17) Ferrajoli. Direito e razão..., p. 351.
(18) Lopes Jr, Aury. Direito processual penal. 10. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2013. p. 1137
(19) Bizzotto, Alexandre. A inversão do discurso garantista: a subversão da finalidade das normas constitucionais de conteúdo limitativo para a ampliação do sistema penal. Rio de Janeiro: 2009. p. 125.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).
