What can we learn from the first cases of the Innocence Project Brazil (ii): the Sílvio Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15649715Keywords:
Wrongful Convictions, Criminal Evidence, Evaluation of Evidence, Eyewitness identification, learning from errosAbstract
The article analyzes the Sílvio case, one of the earliest interventions of the Innocence Project Brazil, which led to the reversal of a felony-murder conviction after five years of wrongful imprisonment. It offers a critical examination of the judgment, exposing flaws in the court’s decisional and justificatory reasoning chiefly the failure to assess the reliability of the victim’s testimony, the sole evidence supporting the prosecution’s hypothesis, and the accommodation or outright disregard of exculpatory proof. The study concludes by mapping the systemic factors that likely contributed to the error: automatic acceptance of the indictment, issuance and maintenance of pre-trial detention, Brazilian judges’ outdated understanding of human cognitive limits, the absence of a structured decision-making method, and a fundamental misunderstanding of the criminal judge’s role.
Downloads
References
CLIFFORD, Brian R.; HOLLIN, Clive R. Effects of the type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory. *Journal of Applied Psychology*, v. 66, n. 3, p. 364-370, 1981. ([researchgate.net][2])
DEFFENBACHER, Kenneth A.; BORNSTEIN, Brian H.; PENROD, Steven D.; McGORTY, E. Kiernan. A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. *Law and Human Behavior*, v. 28, n. 6, p. 687-706, 2004. ([pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov][4])
DIGES, Margarita; PÉREZ-MATA, Nieves. La prueba de identificación desde la psicología del testimonio. In: **DIGES, M.** *et al.* (org.). *Identificaciones fotográficas y en rueda de reconocimiento: un análisis desde el Derecho procesal penal y la psicología del testimonio*. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2014. p. 33-85. ([repositorio.uam.es][5])
EISEN, Mitchell L.; SKERRIT-PERTA, A.; OWEN, J.; CEDRE, A.; JONES, J. Pre-admonition suggestion in live showups: when witnesses learn the cops believe they caught “the” guy. *Applied Cognitive Psychology*, v. 31, n. 5, p. 520-529, 2017. ([truecrimefalsememory.com][6])
FAWCETT, Jonathan M.; RUSSELL, Emily J.; PEACE, Kristine A.; CHRISTIE, John. Of guns and geese: a meta-analytic review of the ‘weapon focus’ literature. *Psychology, Crime & Law*, v. 19, n. 1, p. 35-66, 2013. ([researchgate.net][7])
KASSIN, Saul M.; TUBB, V. Anne; HOSCH, Harmon M.; MEMON, Amina. On the “general acceptance” of eyewitness testimony research: a new survey of the experts. *American Psychologist*, v. 56, n. 5, p. 405-416, 2001. ([researchgate.net][8])
MORGAN, Charles A. III *et al.* Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress. *International Journal of Law and Psychiatry*, v. 27, n. 3, p. 265-279, 2004. ([pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov][10])
PARKER, S. A.; SERRATS, A. F. Memory recovery after traumatic coma. *Acta Neurochirurgica*, v. 34, p. 71-77, 1976.
ACCATINO, Daniela. Atomismo y holismo en la justificación probatoria. Isonomía, Ciudad de México, n. 40, p. 17-59, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/is/n40/n40a3.pdf. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2025.
BEECHER-MONAS, Erica. Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process. Cambridge University Press, 2006
BRAGA DAMASCENO, Fernando. A motivação do juízo fático-probatório. Revista de Processo, São Paulo, v. 49, n. 354, p. 95-120, 2024.
BRAGA DAMASCENO, Fernando. Pensando a qualidade do juízo fático-probatório: um modelo de evolução baseado no aprendizado com erros. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, Porto Alegre, v. 9, n. 3, p. 1213-1256, 2023. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.900
BRAGA DAMASCENO, Direito probatório (stricto sensu). Da valoração da prova. São Paulo: Tirant lo blanch. 2023.
CECCONELLO, William Weber; STEIN, Lilian Milnitsky. Prevenindo injustiças: como a psicologia do testemunho pode ajudar a compreender e prevenir o falso reconhecimento de suspeitos. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, Bogotá, v. 38, n. 1, p. 172-188, 2020. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.6471
CECCONELLO, William Weber; FITZGERALD, Ryan J.; STEIN, Lilian Milnitsky. Efeitos do Alinhamento Justo e Similaridade de Rostos no Reconhecimento de Pessoas. Psico-USF, Campinas, v. 27, n. 1, p. 181-191, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712022270114
CECCONELLO, William Weber; ÁVILA, Gustavo Noronha de; STEIN, Lilian Milnitsky. A (ir) repetibilidade da prova penal dependente da memória: uma discussão com base na psicologia do testemunho. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, Brasília, v. 8, n. 2, p. 1057-1073, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.publicacoes.uniceub.br/RBPP/article/view/5312. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2025.
FERRER-BELTRÁN, Jordi. Valoração racional da prova. Tradução: Vitor de Paula Ramos. Salvador: JusPodivm. 2021.
FONDEVILA, Gustavo; QUINTANA-NAVARRETE, Miguel. Determinantes de la sentencia: Detención en flagrancia y prisión preventiva en México. Latin American Law Review, Bogotá, v. 1, n. 4, p. 49-72, 2020. https://doi.org/10.29263/lar04.2020.03
GASCÓN ABELLÁN, Marina. Los hechos en el derecho: bases argumentales de la prueba. Madrid: Marcial Pons, 2010.
GLOECKNER, Ricardo Jacobsen. Prisões cautelares, confirmation bias e o direito fundamental à devida cognição no processo penal. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais, São Paulo, v. 23, n. 117, p. 263-286, 2015.
GONZÁLEZ LAGIER, Daniel. Emociones sin sentimentalismo: sobre las emociones y las decisiones judiciales. Lima: Palestra, 2020.
LEIPOLD, Andrew D. How the pretrial process contributes to wrongful convictions. American Criminal Law Review, v. 42, p. 1123-1165, 2005.
PASSANANTE, Luca. Motivazione della sentenza e accertamento della verità nel pensiero di Michele Taruffo. Revista Ítalo-Española de Derecho Procesal, Madrid, v. 1, p. 85-86, 2021. https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/vol_1_2021_08
TARUFFO, Michele. Verdad, prueba y motivación en la decisión sobre los hechos. México: Tribunal electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación, 2013.
TOSCANO JÚNIOR, Rosivaldo. O cérebro que julga: neurociência para juristas. Florianópolis: Emais, 2023.
TWINING, William. Taking Facts Seriously. Journal of Legal Education, vol. 34, no. 1, 1984, pp. 22–42.
WAGENAAR, Willem A; KOPPEN, P. J. V.; CROMBAG, H. F. M. Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence. Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
WALTON, Douglas; MACAGNO, Fabrizio. Common Knowledge in Legal Reasoning about Evidence. International Commentary on Evidence, volume 3, issue 1. 2005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Prof. Dr. Fernando Braga Damasceno, Prof. Me. Juraci de Souza Santos Junior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright of published articles belongs to the author, but with journal rights over the first publication and respecting the one-year exclusivity period. Authors may only use the same results in other publications by clearly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication. If there is no such indication, it will be considered a situation of self-plagiarism.
Therefore, the reproduction, total or partial, of the articles published here is subject to the express mention of the origin of its publication in this journal, citing the volume and number of this publication. For legal purposes, the source of the original publication must be consigned, in addition to the DOI link for cross-reference (if any).
